![]() Second, the law of armed conflict is flexible enough to appropriately regulate technologically enabled surrender and, more broadly, other emerging technologies. It appears likely that technologically enabled surrender is safer and more efficient for all parties involved. First, technologically enabled surrender is a harbinger of things to come in future armed conflicts. It concludes with an analysis of the impact of these technologies on the surrender process and presents an adaptive interpretation of existing norms, leading to three overarching themes. ![]() This Article discusses the development of the modern legal consequences of surrender under the law of armed conflict and explores how technologically enabled surrender is being used in Ukraine. The process of and acts associated with technologically enabled surrender, as currently observed on the battlefields of Ukraine, are dissimilar in some respects from traditional notions of battlefield surrender. A case in point is Ukraine’s use of modern communications and drone capabilities to facilitate the battlefield surrender of Russian soldiers. In some instances, modern technologies change conduct on battlefields, leading to the reconsideration of applications of existing law of armed conflict principles and rules. Drones, artificial intelligence, cyber capabilities, satellites, and social media platforms, among other technologies, are shaping the conflict in real-time. The international armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine has given the world a glimpse into warfare of the future, where modern technologies are utilized in combat.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |